Fume extraction in welding is not just about maintaining cleanliness; it’s a critical health and safety concern. Welding fumes can be hazardous, and effective extraction systems are essential to safeguard operators’ health.
There are two main types of fume extraction systems in welding: low-vacuum/high-volume and high-vacuum/low-volume. Each technology has distinct benefits and challenges; welders must understand these to select the best option for their tasks.
Low-Vacuum/High-Volume Systems
Low-vacuum/high-volume systems generally use a standard industrial vacuum blower, creating less than 25″ H2O of negative pressure. Though the vacuum pressure is moderate to low, these systems effectively manage large air volumes, sometimes reaching tens of thousands of cubic feet per minute (CFM). This capacity makes them suitable for capturing fumes over broad areas.
Key elements of these systems include flexible arms, extraction hoods, downdraft tables, and dust collectors for filtering fumes.
- Flexible Arms: These components offer easy adjustment to capture fumes while providing flexibility and visibility for welders. The smaller the arms’ diameter, the greater the vacuum needed for effective fume extraction, but it will require less airflow.
- Extraction Hoods: Positioned above the welding space, these hoods capture fumes before they spread, effectively covering larger areas for extensive operations, especially robotic welding.
- Downdraft Tables: These are great for stationary grinding and cutting, pulling particles downwards to maintain a clean workspace, and minimizing fume and dust exposure for workers.
- General Ventilation: Besides specific components like flexible arms and downdraft tables, general ventilation is essential in low-vacuum/high-volume systems. It helps dilute and remove residual fumes, requiring at least four air changes per hour to maintain a safe welding environment.
Although low-vacuum/high-volume systems cover larger areas, they usually extract fumes from a greater distance than high-vacuum/low-volume systems. Their effectiveness relies on correctly positioning the hood. These systems are versatile and suitable for various welding methods, like TIG or stick welding, but might be less effective in capturing highly concentrated fumes directly at the weld point.

High-Vacuum/Low-Volume Systems in Welding
High-vacuum/low-volume systems in welding stand out with their use of high-vacuum turbines, generating negative pressures exceeding 100″ H2O. This high vacuum and lower air volumes make these systems highly effective for capturing fumes close to the welding source, usually within 2 to 4 inches.
These systems typically consist of a vacuum turbine, specialized fume extraction MIG guns or micro captors, and a dust collector.
- Fume Extraction MIG Guns: Central to high-vacuum/low-volume systems, these guns capture fumes at their source, significantly reducing their dispersion. They are particularly effective for MIG welding.
- Micro Captors (such as Extraction Nozzles): Micro captors are essential in these systems for capturing fumes as close to their emission source as possible when a MIG gun is not used.
High-vacuum/low-volume systems are best suited for operations requiring precise fume extraction at the source. They excel at capturing fumes from more concentrated sources, ideal for environments with localized fume generation. The high pressure in these systems allows for the use of longer and narrower hoses.

Comparative Analysis
When comparing the two systems, consider the following aspects:
- Efficiency in Fume Extraction:
- Low-vacuum/high-volume: Efficient over larger areas but may struggle with concentrated fumes near the source.
- High-vacuum/low-volume: Excellent for direct extraction at the source, ideal for operations with concentrated fume production, such as MIG welding.
- Operational Costs:
- Low-vacuum/high-volume: Generally lower initial costs but potentially higher energy usage due to the large volume of air processed.
- High-vacuum/low-volume: Possibly higher upfront costs due to specialized equipment, but more efficient fume extraction can save energy in the long run.
- Suitability for Different Welding Environments:
- Low-vacuum/high-volume: Versatile for various welding processes, including Stick and TIG.
- High-vacuum/low-volume: Ideal for MIG welding and settings requiring precise, localized fume extraction.
- Ease of Use and Maintenance:
- Both systems necessitate regular maintenance, like filter replacements and efficiency checks. Specific maintenance needs may vary based on system type and usage intensity.
Ultimately, the choice between low-vacuum/high-volume and high-vacuum/low-volume systems hinges on the specific needs of the welding environment, such as the type of welding process, the layout of the welding area, and the typical level of fume concentration.
FREE GUIDE
30 EXPERT TIPS FOR A FUME-FREE WORKSPACE
Get your hands on our exclusive guide full of actionable insights. Provide your email below and dive into:
- A compact guide packed with 30 powerful tips to tackle welding fumes effectively.
- Tailored information on regulations you need to know to stay compliant.
- Inspiring success stories from industry peers who’ve transformed their operations.
- Practical advice to help you select the ideal fume extractor tailored to your needs.
Selecting the Right Fume Extraction System Based on Welding Process
Choosing an appropriate fume extraction system is crucial and largely depends on the welding process. Below is a guide to help you decide whether a low-vacuum/high-volume or high-vacuum/low-volume system suits various welding methods.
In the table below, we use the following acronyms:
- HVLV: High-vacuum/low-volume
- LVHV: Low-vacuum/High-volume
Process | MIG gun | Arm | Nozzle | Hood | Table |
Technology | HVLV | LVHV | HVLV | LVHV | LVHV |
MIG / GMAW | Best | Yes | Yes | No | No |
TIG / GTAW | No | Best | Yes | No | No |
Fluxed-Cored / FCAW | Best | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Stick / SMAW | No | Best | Yes | No | No |
Robotic Welding | Yes | Yes* | No | Best | No |
Aluminum Welding | Best** | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Grinding*** | No | No | No | No | Yes |
Plasma Cutting**** | No | No | No | No | Yes |
** When MIG welding aluminum, a fume extraction MIG gun such as AIRGOMIG will be the most efficient (with an aluminum liner). Otherwise, a flexible arm is a good option.
*** On-tool extraction is possible for grinders and would be the most efficient solution in most cases.
**** For a CNC plasma table, it is possible to extract at the source with a Teflon extraction nozzle.
Conclusion
The decision between a low-vacuum/high-volume and a high-vacuum/low-volume fume extraction system is vital for safety and efficiency in welding operations. Each system has advantages and is better suited to certain welding conditions and requirements.
Understanding the specific demands of your welding process and the attributes of these systems allows for a more informed choice, enhancing safety and productivity in the work environment. Opting for the right fume extraction solution is crucial for health and regulatory compliance and the overall quality of the welding work.
Any Questions?
Feel free to contact us. We will help you protect your workers and comply with welding fumes standards anywhere in the US and Canada.
1-866-800-8421
info@airgomig.com